Skip to main content
AI & Agents

Agent Evaluation

Agent evaluation is the practice of scoring an AI agent against a fixed set of real tasks with verified expected outcomes, so that every prompt change, model swap or tool update can be measured rather than guessed at. It is what turns "it seems better" into a number.

Without evaluation, teams cannot tell whether a change improved the system or broke an edge case, and they will not notice when a provider updates the underlying model and shifts behaviour beneath them. The predictable end state is a team too afraid to change anything — a worse position than having a few failing tests.

For tasks with no single correct answer, evaluation combines deterministic checks on the objective parts — did it call the right tool, was the output well-formed, did it stay within policy — with model-graded scoring for the subjective remainder. The critical step is calibrating that grader against human ratings, because an uncalibrated judge produces confident numbers that mean nothing.

Codazz builds this in production — Evaluation & Observability.

FAQ

Agent Evaluation
FAQ.

Common questions about agent evaluation.

Ask Us Anything

Because "seems to work" cannot survive a change. Without evals you cannot tell whether a prompt tweak improved the system or broke an edge case, and you will not notice when a model update shifts behaviour underneath you. The suite is what makes an agent maintainable rather than frozen.