QA & Testing Company in Atlanta

QA pricing in Atlanta follows the evidence an auditor expects to see rather than the raw number of test cases. Programmes are scoped as a test automation engagement (regression suite for a single web or mobile app, CI integration, evidence pack) over eight to fourteen weeks, a multi-system suite covering web, mobile, and API for a Global Payments / Fiserv / Worldpay style stack with PCI-DSS Level 1 evidence, or a full enterprise QA program for Delta Air Lines, UPS, or Home Depot consumer-scale traffic with load, performance, accessibility, and security testing. Codazz bills fixed fees so a Buckhead controller or an Alpharetta procurement lead can lock the number before the SOC 2 auditor walks in. Ongoing maintenance retainers are scoped separately.

Global Payments, Fiserv, Worldpay / FIS, Bakkt, Greenlight, and Kabbage all sit at PCI-DSS Level 1 (more than six million card transactions per year), which means an annual Report on Compliance from a QSA. Our test suites cover Requirement 6.5 (OWASP Top 10 plus EMVCo-specific issues), Requirement 11.3 (penetration testing scope alignment), Requirement 11.6 (change detection on payment pages), and the cardholder data flow end-to-end (authorisation, capture, settlement, chargeback, refund, tokenisation, EMV 3DS 2.x challenge / frictionless flows). We integrate Visa CISP, Mastercard SDP, and Discover DISC sandbox harnesses. ASV scans are scheduled and result-tracked. The QSA receives a single evidence pack, not a hunt across Confluence.

Yes. Our load testing scenarios are sized to documented Atlanta peak profiles: Delta SkyMiles redemption during seat-sale windows, UPS volume during Cyber Week and the December peak, Home Depot Pro and homeowner traffic during hurricane season and spring gardening, and Coca-Cola consumer-engagement traffic around Super Bowl and Olympic sponsorship moments. We run k6 and Gatling against staging environments hosted in Equinix AT1 / AT2 / AT3 or AWS us-east-1 (Northern Virginia), capture P50 / P95 / P99 latency, error rate, and saturation points, and produce a written capacity plan that maps to AWS Auto Scaling group sizing or Kubernetes HPA configuration. Test data uses synthetic PII that respects the Georgia Personal Identity Protection Act.

We never use raw PHI in lower environments. Test data is synthesised with Faker, libfaker, or a custom generator that produces records satisfying the HIPAA Safe Harbor de-identification standard (eighteen identifiers stripped). For integration testing against Epic, Cerner, or Allscripts at Emory Healthcare, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, or Grady Health, we use the vendor-provided sandbox or a fully de-identified subset reviewed by the client's privacy officer before any test runs. All test artifacts, screenshots, and HAR files are scrubbed of PII before they leave the test runner. We deliver a written HIPAA test data handling policy aligned with NIST 800-66r2 that your privacy officer can adopt without rewriting.

Yes, for Atlanta clients with federal touch (CDC contractors, FDA inspection vendors, HRSA grantees, Emory federal research projects). FISMA Moderate baseline tests align with NIST 800-53 Rev 5 control families: access control (AC), audit and accountability (AU), configuration management (CM), incident response (IR), system and communications protection (SC), and system and information integrity (SI). We map every test case to a control reference, produce evidence in the format the assessor expects (typically OSCAL JSON or a Word System Security Plan annex), and integrate with the client's existing Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) workflow. For CDC-adjacent work we also handle the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 52.204-21 basic safeguarding requirements.

Atlanta consumer surfaces (Delta.com, UPS.com, HomeDepot.com, MyCoke, Mailchimp dashboards) are class-action targets under ADA Title III and Section 508 if the client touches federal contracting. We test against WCAG 2.2 Level AA using axe-core, Pa11y, and Lighthouse in CI plus assistive-technology manual review with JAWS, NVDA, and VoiceOver. Findings are mapped to specific WCAG success criteria, ticketed in Jira with reproduction steps, and re-tested before sign-off. For Delta and UPS we maintain a published Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) using the VPAT 2.5 template, which doubles as a Section 508 evidence artifact and a litigation defence. We do not ship sites with known Level A violations; that is the engineering floor.

Test code lives in the client's Git repo, runs in the client's CI (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI), and reports into the client's existing dashboards (Datadog, Splunk, New Relic). We embed with the dev team on EST hours from our NY office, stand up daily in the existing engineering Slack, and treat test failures as engineering tickets, not as QA team artifacts. Knowledge transfer is continuous; we document test patterns, fixtures, and CI configuration in the client's Confluence or Notion as we go. At handoff the suite is owned by the client team with at most a six-week support tail; we are not in the business of building dependencies.

Yes. We use Appium plus BrowserStack or Sauce Labs device farms covering the top fifty iOS and Android devices by Atlanta-market share, plus a manual smoke test on flagship devices (Pixel 9 Pro, iPhone 16 Pro, Samsung Galaxy S25). For Delta we test the Fly Delta app against TSA PreCheck, biometric boarding, and SkyClub access flows; for UPS the My Choice and Quantum View paths; for Home Depot the Pro Xtra and curbside pickup flows. Each release goes through pre-submission App Store and Play Store policy review (Apple App Store Review Guidelines 5.1.x privacy, Google Play Data Safety) so the binary does not get pulled after launch. Crashlytics or Sentry instrumentation is part of the test sign-off, not an afterthought.