Product Design Company in Dallas

Pricing depends on scope, so we quote each engagement individually after discovery. As general guidance, a focused UX audit or redesign of one critical flow sits at the smaller end; a multi-role enterprise workflow or customer portal sits in the middle; a full design system plus legacy internal-tool modernization across several applications sits at the larger end. Cost drivers include the number of roles and flows, research depth, regulated-industry review cycles, and whether you need net-new system governance or an extension of an existing Figma library. We provide fixed-fee proposals in USD with milestones, not open-ended hourly retainers without deliverables.

Timelines follow scope and stakeholder availability. A UX audit or single-flow redesign often runs four to eight weeks. A broader portal or operational tool redesign typically runs ten to sixteen weeks. Enterprise design system foundations plus documentation commonly run twelve to twenty weeks for a first release, with expansion phased after adoption. Legacy internal-tool modernization is usually delivered in waves so teams ship value while older modules are retired. We share a schedule after discovery and hold design reviews on Central Time so decisions do not wait on overnight time zones.

Yes. We build and extend Figma design systems with primitive and semantic tokens, documented components, usage rules, and handoff aligned to Storybook or your existing component library. Governance covers who can contribute components, how breaking changes are versioned, and how product, brand, and platform engineering stay aligned—patterns enterprise teams in Plano, Irving, and Las Colinas need when many apps share customers or operators. We can start from scratch or organise fragmented libraries into a single source of truth without forcing a rip-and-replace of every screen on day one.

Yes. Legacy internal applications are a common Dallas-Fort Worth brief: stable backends, dated navigation, and workflows that grew faster than the IA. We map current tasks and pain points, prioritize journeys by operational impact, redesign in Figma with WCAG 2.1 AA in scope, and plan phased rollout so teams are not blocked by a big-bang rewrite. We document parity requirements, edge cases surfaced by support and ops, and handoff notes so engineering can implement incrementally—whether your team builds or Codazz handles development on a separate scoped engagement.

We design and review against WCAG 2.1 AA: contrast, target size, keyboard access, focus order, form labels, error identification, and screen-reader-friendly structure. Checks run during design reviews, not only at the end. Enterprise buyers and public-sector adjacent work in Texas often treat accessible design as a procurement requirement. We are a design and engineering team, not a law firm—your counsel confirms final legal posture—but deliverables are structured to support VPAT-style reporting and remediation if third-party audits are required.

Yes. Codazz offers product design alongside web development, mobile app development, SaaS development, and enterprise software development, so the team that researches and designs your flows can implement them. Shared context reduces rework: tokens, components, and interaction notes map directly to code reviews. If you already have engineering in the DFW corridor or elsewhere, we deliver Figma, documentation, and walkthroughs built for your stack; if you want one partner end to end, we scope design and build as connected milestones with CST checkpoints throughout.